Summary of California’s new marijuana laws
Effective November 9, 2016: Here are California’s adult use marijuana laws Learn more about Proposition 64 by reviewing this link.
Cannabis hemp advocate, author, expert witness, educator, curator, artist
Effective November 9, 2016: Here are California’s adult use marijuana laws Learn more about Proposition 64 by reviewing this link.
People v. Urziceanu: While Prop 215 did not protect collective medical marijuana gardens or sales, SB420 HS 11362.775 did (ending in 2019). NOTICE: The California Legislature voted to terminate the legal defenses for Collective gardens and sales in […]
SB 420 / Senate Bill 420 Cannabis collective defense; AB266 / 243 Collective defense ends in 2019 SB 2679 Interim extraction licenses through 2019 Summary: In 2003 the California legislature (SB420) created a limited collective […]
People v. Bergen: Medical use is not a defense against charge, use of chemical extraction to manufacture a controlled substance Note: Because marijuana and extracts are in the controlled substance list, because the HS 11379.6(a) […]
Hempresent Radio: Seattle Hempfest’s own Vivian McPeak interviews California activist Chris Conrad on why he is supporting Proposition 64, the Adult Use of Marijuan Act. Click here to listen in.
Review, explanation and analysis By Chris Conrad, with Mikki Norris, Lauren Vazquez and assorted other attorneys and experts on the initiative. © Drug Policy Action, 2016 This document explains the structure and functions of the proposed […]
California businesses have three options currently: 1) SB 420 patient collective defense until 2019; 2) MCRSA medical marijuana licenses available in 2018; 3) AUMA (Prop. 64 nonmedical licenses available as provisional licenses now or with state […]
Health and Safety Code – HSC 11357 – 11362.9 A compendium of California marijuana definitions and statutory laws related to cannabis hemp / marijuana as they were listed from 1976 to 2016, when the voters […]
PEOPLE v. ORLOSKY 233Cal.App.4th257(2015) • 182 Cal.Rptr.3d 561 Evidence of formally organized collective was not required for collective marijuana cultivation defense to be applicable in trial for marijuana possession and cultivation. (Note: Pursuant to HS […]